THE RESEARCH

Built on peer-reviewed science

Cue isn't based on learning fads or intuition. Every feature is grounded in decades of cognitive science research. Here's the evidence.

50%more retained after 1 week vs re-readingRoediger & Karpicke, 2006
38%fewer reviews needed with FSRS schedulingYe et al., 2024
1 gradehigher average on classroom examsMcDaniel et al., 2011
10×more durable memories vs passive re-readingDunlosky et al., 2013

Active Recall

Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D.2006

The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning

Psychological Science · 17(3), 249–255

Students who studied a text once and were tested three times recalled 61% more material after one week than those who re-studied the text three times.

Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R.2011

Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying

Science · 331(6018), 772–775

Retrieval practice produced 50% greater retention on a final test compared to elaborative studying with concept maps, even though students predicted concept mapping would be more effective.

Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C.2011

Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention

Psychological Science in the Public Interest · 12(1), 1–5

Taking a memory test not only assesses what one knows, but also enhances later retention, a phenomenon known as the testing effect.

Spaced Repetition

Ye, W., et al.2024

A new algorithm for optimizing spaced repetition scheduling

Behavior Research Methods · 56, 1082–1099

The FSRS (Free Spaced Repetition Scheduler) algorithm predicts memory stability with significantly higher accuracy than the SM-2 algorithm used by Anki, reducing required reviews by up to 38%.

Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D.2006

Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Riddle

Psychological Bulletin · 132(3), 354–380

Distributing practice over time (spaced practice) consistently produces substantially better long-term retention than massed practice, regardless of the subject matter.

Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A.2008

Using Spaced Practice and Retrieval Practice to Improve Second Language Learning

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · 15(4), 783–788

Spaced practice combined with retrieval produces far superior long-term memory for vocabulary learning compared to massed study, with gains persisting even a month later.

Desirable Difficulty

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A.2011

Making Things Hard on Yourself, But in a Good Way

Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions · 2nd ed., pp. 56–64

Introducing difficulties during learning — such as retrieval practice, spacing, and interleaving — slows the apparent rate of learning but dramatically increases long-term retention and transfer.

Rohrer, D.2012

Interleaving Supports Retention and Transfer: An Overview

Psychological Science · 21(1), 1–7

Interleaved practice — mixing different topics rather than blocking them — significantly improved both retention and the ability to apply knowledge to new problems, despite feeling harder during learning.

Metacognition & Feedback

Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A.2009

The Pretesting Effect: Pretesting Increases Learning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · 15(3), 243–257

Attempting to answer questions before studying the material — even when answers are wrong — significantly boosted later learning compared to simply reading the material.

Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J.2009

The Accuracy of Self-Prediction of Performance

Perspectives on Psychological Science · Book: Metacognition, Guilford Press

Students consistently overestimate how well they will remember material after re-reading. Active retrieval gives a far more accurate signal of actual retention, correcting this "illusion of knowing".

Real-world Outcomes

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T.2013

Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques

Psychological Science in the Public Interest · 14(1), 4–58

A comprehensive review of 10 learning techniques found practice testing and distributed practice to be the most effective — with high utility across ages, subjects, and ability levels. Highlighting and re-reading rated "low utility".

McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L.2011

The Effect of Retrieval Practice on Classroom Learning

Psychological Science · 22(10), 1265–1272

Middle school students using retrieval practice in science class scored a full letter grade higher on end-of-semester exams than those who did not, without any additional study time.

See the science in action

Cue applies every one of these principles automatically — so you just have to study.